Independent lab evidence
XTP
Xi'an Taiye Chemical Co.XTP’s lab evidence dates to April 2025 and covers 71 test records across 13 recorded compound names, alongside 7 community reviews. Median purity is 99.5% across 50 positive purity tests.
▸ What you can check next
Reports by test date
71 published records · 0 excluded by the current index · Names on reports; vendor role unverified. A test record is not necessarily a unique certificate.
Key facts
All time unless datedEndotoxin failures
8 classified tests
Expected compound not detected
50 reported purity outcomes
None recordedUnderfilled >15%
15 fill tests · Last 6 months
Overfilled >15%
15 fill tests · Last 6 months
Reported zero amount
42 numeric amount results
None recordedTest results
How the fills compare
28 fill tests · All timeMeasured against the printed amount. Finnrick quantities are excluded.
Beyond the purity average
50 positive testsMean 97.9% · Median 99.5%. The 90% grouping is not a safety threshold.
Test coverage & missing results
21 records have no usable purity outcome. 43 do not have a comparable fill test. 63 lack a classified endotoxin result. A classified pass does not mean no endotoxin was detected.
Community reviews
All 7 reviews →The 7 most recent approved reviews. Buyer experiences—not lab results or verified purchases.
- Reviewer
- 308fanUsername as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-05-25
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- NegativeSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#5122e705
- Reviewer
- bjw76Username as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-05-22
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#cf36dfe9
- Reviewer
- sheilarae74Username as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-04-27
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#9f01ad78
- Reviewer
- DerbyshireUsername as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-04-11
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#564e4d58
- Reviewer
- JerrydeeUsername as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-03-07
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#e42180d9
- Reviewer
- Cdub100Username as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-02-06
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#7a221213
- Reviewer
- Jfrick11Username as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-01-27
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#4c0fb25f
Public review excerpts
Prices & value
Market price index →Recorded offers—not a live stock guarantee. Package quantity, delivery market and price basis stay attached.
Listing layout preview. Actual offers appear after access is checked.
Evidence over time
Dated records—not a performance trend2025-04-29 — 2026-09-09
Research involving XTP
All research →Published investigations, with the sources and context behind the findings.
Questions about XTP
Answers based on the published evidence—not a vendor endorsement.
Is XTP legit?
TitrateLab does not rank or recommend vendors; it reports what independent labs measured. XTP shows mixed measured purity (97.9% mean across 50 positive purity measurements). Dose accuracy is mixed: in the last 12 months 10 of 23 dose results were on target, 3 under label and 10 over; all time 15 of 28 on target, 3 under and 10 over. These results describe tested batches, not every product or shipment.
What is XTP's average purity?
97.9% mean measured purity across 50 positive third-party lab results; 47 were at or above 90% and 3 were below.
How many XTP lab certificates has TitrateLab tracked?
71 third-party certificates from 2025-04-29 to 2026-09-09, covering 13 compounds.
How accurate are XTP's doses?
Dose accuracy is mixed: in the last 12 months 10 of 23 dose results were on target, 3 under label and 10 over; all time 15 of 28 on target, 3 under and 10 over. A dose result compares the measured amount with the amount printed on the label: under is more than 10% below, over is more than 10% above, on target is everything in between. Finnrick results are excluded because that lab measures against the vendor's batch claim. Missing values are never counted as passes.
Has XTP failed an endotoxin test?
Endotoxin was reported on 8 of 71 counted records (11.3%). No failure was recorded; 1 of 8 results were borderline. Coverage is too limited for a vendor-wide conclusion.
Sources, definitions & limits
71 published records are attributed to this vendor. The current certificate index excludes 0 repeated records using file hashes and supported lab verification links. Missing identity keys can leave repeated certificates. Recorded name groups can include variants, mixtures and unclassified names.
Evidence dates describe the tested samples, not when the vendor was founded, current stock, or a performance trend. Purity uses positive measurements only. Exact-zero purity is a not-detected identity outcome, not proof of an empty vial. A zero measured amount requires an explicit numeric amount result; missing amounts are not zero.
Underfills and overfills here exceed 15% in either direction against the printed amount. Vendor batch claims are not used; Finnrick quantity comparisons are excluded. Recent outcomes cover 2026-03-17 through 2026-09-17, inclusive. The older published ±10% partition may appear in the existing FAQ and is a different, explicitly labelled threshold. Missing tests are not passing results.
Endotoxin failures, borderline outcomes and passes use the recorded lab verdict. A pass is not proof of no endotoxin. Only 8 records have a classifiable result. Community sentiment describes reviews, not laboratory measurements or independently verified purchases. Results are not certification, medical advice or endorsement.
Missing measurements stay missing. Membership unlocks access, not additional testing.