MOTS-c lab reports
What the MOTS-c record shows
Evidence through 2026-10-16TitrateLab tracks 4,045 published MOTS-c certificate-of-analysis source records through 2026-10-16, each with a recorded purity or measured-versus-label amount result. Across 4,044 records with a numeric peptide-purity result, including zero, the median reported purity is 99.5%. Across 3,517 records with measured-versus-label dose data, 51% are within 10% of the labeled quantity. This is a public convenience sample, not a randomized market survey; one result describes one submitted sample and does not verify other batches.
Published records with a non-null purity or measured-versus-label amount result. Matching uses a normalized compound slug. No deduplication in this archive summary; relays and corrected records can remain separate. Records with neither measurement are excluded here, but can appear in the research overview's exact-token raw-record total. These are not unique certificates or batches. TitrateLab indexes reports from third-party laboratories.
Aggregate calculated: 2026-10-18T04:31:27.912495+00:00. Calculation time is not a test date.
Limits and missing evidence
- The testing laboratory is unattributed on 32 records.
- Coverage depends on reports that were published and available to ingest.
MOTS-c lab-testing metrics
COAs per testing lab
Every lab testing MOTS-c in the corpus.
Tested-purity distribution
Bins below 90% tested purity (0% of numeric purity records).
| Purity range | Certificates |
|---|---|
| 0–50% | 8 |
| 50–70% | 0 |
| 70–80% | 1 |
| 80–85% | 0 |
| 85–90% | 1 |
| 90–91% | 0 |
| 91–92% | 0 |
| 92–93% | 0 |
| 93–94% | 1 |
| 94–95% | 2 |
| 95–96% | 5 |
| 96–97% | 4 |
| 97–98% | 10 |
| 98–99% | 131 |
| 99–100% | 3881 |
COAs over time
MOTS-c source records by test month (discovery month when test date is absent).
| Month | Certificates |
|---|---|
| 2022-07 | 3 |
| 2023-04 | 1 |
| 2023-09 | 1 |
| 2023-11 | 1 |
| 2023-12 | 1 |
| 2024-01 | 1 |
| 2024-02 | 2 |
| 2024-03 | 2 |
| 2024-04 | 2 |
| 2024-05 | 6 |
| 2024-06 | 3 |
| 2024-08 | 4 |
| 2024-09 | 1 |
| 2024-10 | 1 |
| 2024-11 | 4 |
| 2024-12 | 2 |
| 2025-01 | 11 |
| 2025-02 | 5 |
| 2025-03 | 10 |
| 2025-04 | 7 |
| 2025-05 | 23 |
| 2025-06 | 28 |
| 2025-07 | 50 |
| 2025-08 | 36 |
| 2025-09 | 68 |
| 2025-10 | 110 |
| 2025-11 | 113 |
| 2025-12 | 172 |
| 2026-01 | 188 |
| 2026-02 | 232 |
| 2026-03 | 203 |
| 2026-04 | 281 |
| 2026-05 | 363 |
| 2026-06 | 447 |
| 2026-07 | 495 |
| 2026-08 | 539 |
| 2026-09 | 484 |
| 2026-10 | 145 |
Most-tested vendors
Top 10 of 15 vendors by MOTS-c certificate count.
+ 5 more vendors with fewer certificates.
Published MOTS-c certificates of analysis
Open all 4,045 MOTS-c reports.
Unlock the actual vendor, purity, dose accuracy, lab, batch and saved certificate for every MOTS-c result.
Unlock MOTS-c reportsPro · $14/month or $88/year
Illustrative structure only. No record-level values are present in this preview.
Reading MOTS-c lab reports
A valid report describes the sample that was submitted, not every vial sold under the same name. Guide: How to verify and read a peptide COA: 5 checks.
