Mots-c: 4,423 published COA source records

32 studies on Mots-c curated from PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EuropePMC. Updated daily.

Bottom line: TitrateLab indexes 4,423 published Mots-c COA source records from third-party laboratories, covering 1,338 publicly attributable vendor identities. Across 4,036 records with positive numeric purity, the arithmetic mean is 99.47%. 8 records report zero purity; these remain in the record count and are excluded from the positive-purity mean. 2 positive purity results are below 90%; 100 records report measured amount more than 10% below the label. The latest recorded test date is 2026-10-16. TitrateLab did not perform these laboratory tests. Source records are not unique batches, and vendor identity does not establish manufacturing role, product safety or overall quality.

Mots-c average prices

As of 2026-10-18, vendor-blind retail asking-price averages for the US delivery market, calculated from the same in-stock exact-strength cells as the Peptide Price Index. Shipping is excluded.

Strength Average / vial Observed range / vial Average / mg Coverage
10 mg $8.25 $7.00–$9.50 $0.82 2 sources · 2 offers
20 mg $15.75 $15.50–$16.00 $0.79 2 sources · 2 offers
40 mg $25.83 $21.50–$32.50 $0.65 3 sources · 3 offers

Asking prices are not manufacturing cost and do not establish product equivalence, quality, safety, or legality. View full price methodology →

Mots-c: published third-party laboratory evidence

All published source records, including absent and zero purity. Matching uses a case-insensitive exact peptide token. No deduplication in the headline; vendor rankings deduplicate eligible certificates separately. The COA archive can use normalized compound names and a different measurement or duplicate policy; totals from these populations need not match.

Latest recorded test: 2026-10-16. Aggregate calculated: 2026-10-18T04:26:35.128308+00:00. Calculation time is not a laboratory observation date.

Within that total, 1359 source records have unresolved vendor identity. They remain in corpus-level lab evidence and are excluded from named-vendor rankings.

99.47%
Mean positive purity
8
Records reporting zero purity
4423
Published source records
1338
Public vendor identities
2
Positive results below 90%
100
Amount below label >10%

Top 3 vendor evidence profiles for Mots-c

Eligible vendors have at least 2 deduplicated certificates and 2 classifiable identity observations. Rank uses the 95% lower confidence bound on clean identity results; mean positive purity and certificate count break ties. Missing measurements are not passes. Exact-zero/not-detected and explicit wrong-compound markers count once per adverse certificate. This describes submitted-sample evidence, not every product or shipment, and is not an endorsement.

RankVendorDeduplicated certificatesAvg positive purityIdentity adverse results
#1 64 99.34% 0 of 62 (0.0%) 0 0% / not detected · 0 wrong compound · 2 unclassified Reveal with Pro →
#2 54 99.5% 0 of 49 (0.0%) 0 0% / not detected · 0 wrong compound · 5 unclassified Reveal with Pro →
#3 27 99.42% 0 of 27 (0.0%) 0 0% / not detected · 0 wrong compound Reveal with Pro →

Vendor identities are included with Pro. Record counts and lab measurements remain visible.

Recent source records: #120376 (99.03%) · #120481 (99.58%) · #120248 (99.79%) · #119652 (99.11%) · #119574 (99.16%) · #119561 (99.2%)

Mots-c studies and clinical research

Research tools

Free, no account — handy when you're working with Mots-c.

Reconstitution calculator Bac water, concentration & insulin-unit math Verify a COA Look up a report number against our corpus