Independent lab evidence
UTHER
Uther PeptideUTHER’s lab evidence dates to May 2024 and covers 1480 test records across 133 recorded compound names, alongside 389 community reviews. Median purity is 99.7% across 1160 positive purity tests.
▸ What you can check next
Reports by test date
1485 published records · 5 excluded by the current index · Names on reports; vendor role unverified. A test record is not necessarily a unique certificate.
Key facts
All time unless datedEndotoxin failures
57 classified tests
Expected compound not detected
1164 reported purity outcomes
Underfilled >15%
269 fill tests · Last 6 months
Overfilled >15%
269 fill tests · Last 6 months
Reported zero amount
1216 numeric amount results
Test results
How the fills compare
1006 fill tests · All timeMeasured against the printed amount. Finnrick quantities are excluded.
Beyond the purity average
1160 positive testsMean 99.4% · Median 99.7%. The 90% grouping is not a safety threshold.
Test coverage & missing results
316 records have no usable purity outcome. 474 do not have a comparable fill test. 1423 lack a classified endotoxin result. A classified pass does not mean no endotoxin was detected.
Community reviews
All 389 reviews →The 10 most recent approved reviews. Buyer experiences—not lab results or verified purchases.
- Vendor
- UTHER — Uther Peptide
- Reviewer
- Tyler LynnUsername as posted on Peptide.chat
- Date
- 2026-08-04
- Source
- Peptide.chat
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#9dd53430
- Vendor
- UTHER — Uther Peptide
- Reviewer
- Dilos TillUsername as posted on Peptide.chat
- Date
- 2026-08-04
- Source
- Peptide.chat
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#57f670d3
- Vendor
- UTHER — Uther Peptide
- Reviewer
- Oh PossumUsername as posted on Peptide.chat
- Date
- 2026-08-04
- Source
- Peptide.chat
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#7accc7c7
- Vendor
- UTHER — Uther Peptide
- Reviewer
- Deneb 🦴Username as posted on Peptide.chat
- Date
- 2026-08-03
- Source
- Peptide.chat
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#a6be0061
- Vendor
- UTHER — Uther Peptide
- Reviewer
- KenjaminUsername as posted on Peptide.chat
- Date
- 2026-08-03
- Source
- Peptide.chat
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#ebe4c75a
- Vendor
- UTHER — Uther Peptide
- Reviewer
- MimsyUsername as posted on Peptide.chat
- Date
- 2026-08-02
- Source
- Peptide.chat
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#4f4e6da5
- Vendor
- UTHER — Uther Peptide
- Reviewer
- SabraCadabraV2Username as posted on Peptide.chat
- Date
- 2026-08-02
- Source
- Peptide.chat
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#eb6fb941
- Vendor
- UTHER — Uther Peptide
- Reviewer
- Bilbo BagginsUsername as posted on Peptide.chat
- Date
- 2026-08-01
- Source
- Peptide.chat
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#377d1378
- Vendor
- UTHER — Uther Peptide
- Reviewer
- Yukon CorneliusUsername as posted on Peptide.chat
- Date
- 2026-07-31
- Source
- Peptide.chat
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#bbacbb3a
- Vendor
- UTHER — Uther Peptide
- Reviewer
- adversarial profit extractorUsername as posted on Peptide.chat
- Date
- 2026-07-31
- Source
- Peptide.chat
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#2467f9d9
Public review excerpts
Prices & value
Market price index →Recorded offers—not a live stock guarantee. Package quantity, delivery market and price basis stay attached.
Listing layout preview. Actual offers appear after access is checked.
Evidence over time
Dated records—not a performance trend2024-05-15 — 2026-08-31
Research involving UTHER
All research →Published investigations, with the sources and context behind the findings.
Chinese HGH catalog withdrawals: policy, availability and laboratory evidence
A dated investigation of Chinese export rules, supplier withdrawals and remaining HGH listings, with historical laboratory coverage and price limits.
Retatrutide: testing volume and reliability evidence
A dated comparison of five international seller identities, with distinct report counts, source-checked identity findings and explicit limits on reliability claims.
Questions about UTHER
Answers based on the published evidence—not a vendor endorsement.
Is UTHER legit?
TitrateLab does not rank or recommend vendors; it reports what independent labs measured. UTHER shows high measured purity (99.4% mean across 1160 positive purity measurements; 4 identity failures reported separately). Dose accuracy is mixed and recent underfills are uncommon: in the last 12 months 170 of 678 dose results were on target, 5 under label and 503 over; all time 260 of 1006 on target, 10 under and 736 over. These results describe tested batches, not every product or shipment.
What is UTHER's average purity?
99.4% mean measured purity across 1160 positive third-party lab results; 1156 were at or above 90% and 4 were below. In 4 additional tests, the labeled compound was not detected.
How many UTHER lab certificates has TitrateLab tracked?
1485 third-party certificates from 2024-05-15 to 2026-08-31, covering 127 compounds. 5 duplicate certificates were excluded from the counts.
How accurate are UTHER's doses?
Dose accuracy is mixed and recent underfills are uncommon: in the last 12 months 170 of 678 dose results were on target, 5 under label and 503 over; all time 260 of 1006 on target, 10 under and 736 over. A dose result compares the measured amount with the amount printed on the label: under is more than 10% below, over is more than 10% above, on target is everything in between. Finnrick results are excluded because that lab measures against the vendor's batch claim. Missing values are never counted as passes.
Has UTHER failed an endotoxin test?
Endotoxin was reported on 57 of 1480 counted records (3.9%). 12 of 57 classifiable results failed and 3 were borderline. Coverage is too limited for a vendor-wide conclusion.
Sources, definitions & limits
1485 published records are attributed to this vendor. The current certificate index excludes 5 repeated records using file hashes and supported lab verification links. Missing identity keys can leave repeated certificates. Recorded name groups can include variants, mixtures and unclassified names.
Evidence dates describe the tested samples, not when the vendor was founded, current stock, or a performance trend. Purity uses positive measurements only. Exact-zero purity is a not-detected identity outcome, not proof of an empty vial. A zero measured amount requires an explicit numeric amount result; missing amounts are not zero.
Underfills and overfills here exceed 15% in either direction against the printed amount. Vendor batch claims are not used; Finnrick quantity comparisons are excluded. Recent outcomes cover 2026-03-17 through 2026-09-17, inclusive. The older published ±10% partition may appear in the existing FAQ and is a different, explicitly labelled threshold. Missing tests are not passing results.
Endotoxin failures, borderline outcomes and passes use the recorded lab verdict. A pass is not proof of no endotoxin. Only 57 records have a classifiable result. Community sentiment describes reviews, not laboratory measurements or independently verified purchases. Results are not certification, medical advice or endorsement.
Missing measurements stay missing. Membership unlocks access, not additional testing.