Independent lab evidence
SPB
SPB’s lab evidence dates to December 2024 and covers 86 test records across 17 recorded compound names, alongside 30 community reviews. Median purity is 99.7% across 70 positive purity tests.
▸ What you can check next
Reports by test date
86 published records · 0 excluded by the current index · Names on reports; vendor role unverified. A test record is not necessarily a unique certificate.
Key facts
All time unless datedEndotoxin failures
14 classified tests
Expected compound not detected
70 reported purity outcomes
None recordedUnderfilled >15%
5 fill tests · Last 6 months
Overfilled >15%
5 fill tests · Last 6 months
Reported zero amount
69 numeric amount results
None recordedTest results
How the fills compare
38 fill tests · All timeMeasured against the printed amount. Finnrick quantities are excluded.
Beyond the purity average
70 positive testsMean 99.6% · Median 99.7%. The 90% grouping is not a safety threshold.
Test coverage & missing results
16 records have no usable purity outcome. 48 do not have a comparable fill test. 72 lack a classified endotoxin result. A classified pass does not mean no endotoxin was detected.
Community reviews
All 30 reviews →The 10 most recent approved reviews. Buyer experiences—not lab results or verified purchases.
- Vendor
- SPB
- Reviewer
- Ahobo1Username as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-08-09
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveProvided by the source
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#49228778
- Vendor
- SPB
- Reviewer
- JtUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-04
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#5fffb832
- Vendor
- SPB
- Reviewer
- Bubbly_otterUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-30
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#8e3d604e
- Vendor
- SPB
- Reviewer
- CiscoMDUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-27
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#f64b5ee4
- Vendor
- SPB
- Reviewer
- SolanaExpertDevUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-27
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#e466df0f
- Vendor
- SPB
- Reviewer
- Just MartUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-26
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#c140dfc3
- Vendor
- SPB
- Reviewer
- Shermantank5531Username as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-25
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#683540e1
- Vendor
- SPB
- Reviewer
- A AUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-25
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#48924b3e
- Vendor
- SPB
- Reviewer
- RaquelUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-24
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#85cc1e84
- Vendor
- SPB
- Reviewer
- Ms22117Username as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-24
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#5c732a3c
Public review excerpts
Prices & value
Market price index →Recorded offers—not a live stock guarantee. Package quantity, delivery market and price basis stay attached.
Listing layout preview. Actual offers appear after access is checked.
Evidence over time
Dated records—not a performance trend2024-12-16 — 2026-09-03
Research involving SPB
All research →Published investigations, with the sources and context behind the findings.
No vendor-specific investigations are listed yet. The lab evidence and community reviews are available in their tabs.
Questions about SPB
Answers based on the published evidence—not a vendor endorsement.
Is SPB legit?
TitrateLab does not rank or recommend vendors; it reports what independent labs measured. SPB shows high measured purity (99.6% mean across 70 positive purity measurements). Dose accuracy is mixed and recent underfills are uncommon: in the last 12 months 13 of 26 dose results were on target, 1 under label and 12 over; all time 23 of 38 on target, 1 under and 14 over. These results describe tested batches, not every product or shipment.
What is SPB's average purity?
99.6% mean measured purity across 70 positive third-party lab results; 70 were at or above 90% and 0 were below.
How many SPB lab certificates has TitrateLab tracked?
86 third-party certificates from 2024-12-16 to 2026-09-03, covering 16 compounds.
How accurate are SPB's doses?
Dose accuracy is mixed and recent underfills are uncommon: in the last 12 months 13 of 26 dose results were on target, 1 under label and 12 over; all time 23 of 38 on target, 1 under and 14 over. A dose result compares the measured amount with the amount printed on the label: under is more than 10% below, over is more than 10% above, on target is everything in between. Finnrick results are excluded because that lab measures against the vendor's batch claim. Missing values are never counted as passes.
Has SPB failed an endotoxin test?
Endotoxin was reported on 14 of 86 counted records (16.3%). 6 of 14 classifiable results failed and 2 were borderline.
Sources, definitions & limits
86 published records are attributed to this vendor. The current certificate index excludes 0 repeated records using file hashes and supported lab verification links. Missing identity keys can leave repeated certificates. Recorded name groups can include variants, mixtures and unclassified names.
Evidence dates describe the tested samples, not when the vendor was founded, current stock, or a performance trend. Purity uses positive measurements only. Exact-zero purity is a not-detected identity outcome, not proof of an empty vial. A zero measured amount requires an explicit numeric amount result; missing amounts are not zero.
Underfills and overfills here exceed 15% in either direction against the printed amount. Vendor batch claims are not used; Finnrick quantity comparisons are excluded. Recent outcomes cover 2026-03-17 through 2026-09-17, inclusive. The older published ±10% partition may appear in the existing FAQ and is a different, explicitly labelled threshold. Missing tests are not passing results.
Endotoxin failures, borderline outcomes and passes use the recorded lab verdict. A pass is not proof of no endotoxin. Only 14 records have a classifiable result. Community sentiment describes reviews, not laboratory measurements or independently verified purchases. Results are not certification, medical advice or endorsement.
Missing measurements stay missing. Membership unlocks access, not additional testing.