Independent lab evidence
ERP
Shanghai Erp Peptide BiotechnologyERP’s lab evidence dates to September 2025 and covers 141 test records across 17 recorded compound names, alongside 429 community reviews. Median purity is 99.9% across 128 positive purity tests.
▸ What you can check next
Reports by test date
141 published records · 0 excluded by the current index · Names on reports; vendor role unverified. A test record is not necessarily a unique certificate.
Key facts
All time unless datedEndotoxin failures
34 classified tests
Expected compound not detected
132 reported purity outcomes
Underfilled >15%
1 fill tests · Last 6 months
Overfilled >15%
1 fill tests · Last 6 months
Reported zero amount
133 numeric amount results
Test results
How the fills compare
8 fill tests · All timeMeasured against the printed amount. Finnrick quantities are excluded.
Beyond the purity average
128 positive testsMean 99.4% · Median 99.9%. The 90% grouping is not a safety threshold.
Test coverage & missing results
9 records have no usable purity outcome. 133 do not have a comparable fill test. 107 lack a classified endotoxin result. A classified pass does not mean no endotoxin was detected.
Community reviews
All 429 reviews →The 10 most recent approved reviews. Buyer experiences—not lab results or verified purchases.
- Reviewer
- smartymartiUsername as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-08-10
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveProvided by the source
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#4d74b843
- Reviewer
- BigDog8084Username as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-08-06
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveProvided by the source
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#4fa63b4f
- Reviewer
- boytresUsername as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-07-30
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveProvided by the source
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#f88266c1
- Reviewer
- Hanuman0626Username as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-29
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#d8b86073
- Reviewer
- HealthyHeartUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-29
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#45401f3b
- Reviewer
- JPZ2369Username as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-29
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#9136356d
- Reviewer
- tophlandUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-28
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- NegativeSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#7d3b3013
- Reviewer
- bamagirl26Username as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-07-28
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveProvided by the source
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#da79dcf2
- Reviewer
- BiohackhyjinxUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-28
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#47f5ad35
- Reviewer
- UserUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-07-27
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#0ecc755b
Public review excerpts
Prices & value
Market price index →Recorded offers—not a live stock guarantee. Package quantity, delivery market and price basis stay attached.
Listing layout preview. Actual offers appear after access is checked.
Evidence over time
Dated records—not a performance trend2025-09-30 — 2026-09-09
Research involving ERP
All research →Published investigations, with the sources and context behind the findings.
Batch Finder case study: matching codes across seller names
Dated ERP testing and packaging identifiers illustrate cross-seller COA search; shared codes do not prove direct supply or identical production lots.
Chinese HGH catalog withdrawals: policy, availability and laboratory evidence
A dated investigation of Chinese export rules, supplier withdrawals and remaining HGH listings, with historical laboratory coverage and price limits.
Which vendors actually have traceable COAs?
A 41-vendor audit of certificate coverage, named laboratories, recency, and the gaps between a vendor's live catalog and its published testing record.
Questions about ERP
Answers based on the published evidence—not a vendor endorsement.
Is ERP legit?
TitrateLab does not rank or recommend vendors; it reports what independent labs measured. ERP shows high measured purity (99.4% mean across 128 positive purity measurements; 4 identity failures reported separately). Dose accuracy is mixed and no recent result was under label: in the last 12 months 5 of 8 dose results were on target, 0 under label and 3 over; all time 5 of 8 on target, 0 under and 3 over. These results describe tested batches, not every product or shipment.
What is ERP's average purity?
99.4% mean measured purity across 128 positive third-party lab results; 126 were at or above 90% and 2 were below. In 4 additional tests, the labeled compound was not detected.
How many ERP lab certificates has TitrateLab tracked?
141 third-party certificates from 2025-09-30 to 2026-09-09, covering 16 compounds.
How accurate are ERP's doses?
Dose accuracy is mixed and no recent result was under label: in the last 12 months 5 of 8 dose results were on target, 0 under label and 3 over; all time 5 of 8 on target, 0 under and 3 over. A dose result compares the measured amount with the amount printed on the label: under is more than 10% below, over is more than 10% above, on target is everything in between. Finnrick results are excluded because that lab measures against the vendor's batch claim. Missing values are never counted as passes.
Has ERP failed an endotoxin test?
Endotoxin was reported on 34 of 141 counted records (24.1%). No failures were recorded in those 34.
Sources, definitions & limits
141 published records are attributed to this vendor. The current certificate index excludes 0 repeated records using file hashes and supported lab verification links. Missing identity keys can leave repeated certificates. Recorded name groups can include variants, mixtures and unclassified names.
Evidence dates describe the tested samples, not when the vendor was founded, current stock, or a performance trend. Purity uses positive measurements only. Exact-zero purity is a not-detected identity outcome, not proof of an empty vial. A zero measured amount requires an explicit numeric amount result; missing amounts are not zero.
Underfills and overfills here exceed 15% in either direction against the printed amount. Vendor batch claims are not used; Finnrick quantity comparisons are excluded. Recent outcomes cover 2026-03-16 through 2026-09-16, inclusive. The older published ±10% partition may appear in the existing FAQ and is a different, explicitly labelled threshold. Missing tests are not passing results.
Endotoxin failures, borderline outcomes and passes use the recorded lab verdict. A pass is not proof of no endotoxin. Only 34 records have a classifiable result. Community sentiment describes reviews, not laboratory measurements or independently verified purchases. Results are not certification, medical advice or endorsement.
Missing measurements stay missing. Membership unlocks access, not additional testing.