Independent lab evidence
MED
Shenzhen Maide TechnologyMED’s lab evidence dates to November 2025 and covers 31 test records across 13 recorded compound names, alongside 1 community review. Median purity is 99.6% across 23 positive purity tests.
▸ What you can check next
Reports by test date
31 published records · 0 excluded by the current index · Names on reports; vendor role unverified. A test record is not necessarily a unique certificate.
Key facts
All time unless datedEndotoxin failures
0 classified tests
Expected compound not detected
23 reported purity outcomes
None recordedUnderfilled >15%
4 fill tests · Last 6 months
Overfilled >15%
4 fill tests · Last 6 months
Reported zero amount
23 numeric amount results
None recordedTest results
How the fills compare
12 fill tests · All timeMeasured against the printed amount. Finnrick quantities are excluded.
Beyond the purity average
23 positive testsMean 99.3% · Median 99.6%. The 90% grouping is not a safety threshold.
Test coverage & missing results
8 records have no usable purity outcome. 19 do not have a comparable fill test. 31 lack a classified endotoxin result. A classified pass does not mean no endotoxin was detected.
Community reviews
All 1 reviews →The 1 most recent approved review. Buyer experiences—not lab results or verified purchases.
- Reviewer
- RaptorrunnerUsername as posted on the source forum
- Date
- 2026-05-10
- Source
- Independent forums
- Tone
- PositiveProvided by the source
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#ad099e98
Public review excerpts
Prices & value
Market price index →Recorded offers—not a live stock guarantee. Package quantity, delivery market and price basis stay attached.
Listing layout preview. Actual offers appear after access is checked.
Evidence over time
Dated records—not a performance trend2025-11-03 — 2026-07-18
Research involving MED
All research →Published investigations, with the sources and context behind the findings.
No vendor-specific investigations are listed yet. The lab evidence and community reviews are available in their tabs.
Questions about MED
Answers based on the published evidence—not a vendor endorsement.
Is MED legit?
TitrateLab does not rank or recommend vendors; it reports what independent labs measured. MED shows high measured purity (99.3% mean across 23 positive purity measurements). Dose accuracy is mostly on target and no recent result was under label: in the last 12 months 11 of 12 dose results were on target, 0 under label and 1 over; all time 11 of 12 on target, 0 under and 1 over. These results describe tested batches, not every product or shipment.
What is MED's average purity?
99.3% mean measured purity across 23 positive third-party lab results; 23 were at or above 90% and 0 were below.
How many MED lab certificates has TitrateLab tracked?
31 third-party certificates from 2025-11-03 to 2026-07-18, covering 13 compounds.
How accurate are MED's doses?
Dose accuracy is mostly on target and no recent result was under label: in the last 12 months 11 of 12 dose results were on target, 0 under label and 1 over; all time 11 of 12 on target, 0 under and 1 over. A dose result compares the measured amount with the amount printed on the label: under is more than 10% below, over is more than 10% above, on target is everything in between. Finnrick results are excluded because that lab measures against the vendor's batch claim. Missing values are never counted as passes.
Has MED failed an endotoxin test?
No classifiable endotoxin result is on file for any of the 31 counted records.
Sources, definitions & limits
31 published records are attributed to this vendor. The current certificate index excludes 0 repeated records using file hashes and supported lab verification links. Missing identity keys can leave repeated certificates. Recorded name groups can include variants, mixtures and unclassified names.
Evidence dates describe the tested samples, not when the vendor was founded, current stock, or a performance trend. Purity uses positive measurements only. Exact-zero purity is a not-detected identity outcome, not proof of an empty vial. A zero measured amount requires an explicit numeric amount result; missing amounts are not zero.
Underfills and overfills here exceed 15% in either direction against the printed amount. Vendor batch claims are not used; Finnrick quantity comparisons are excluded. Recent outcomes cover 2026-03-17 through 2026-09-17, inclusive. The older published ±10% partition may appear in the existing FAQ and is a different, explicitly labelled threshold. Missing tests are not passing results.
Endotoxin failures, borderline outcomes and passes use the recorded lab verdict. A pass is not proof of no endotoxin. Only 0 records have a classifiable result. Community sentiment describes reviews, not laboratory measurements or independently verified purchases. Results are not certification, medical advice or endorsement.
Missing measurements stay missing. Membership unlocks access, not additional testing.