Independent lab evidence
JEEP
Guangzhou Jeep Biotechnology JeepJEEP’s lab evidence dates to July 2025 and covers 203 test records across 34 recorded compound names, alongside 557 community reviews. Median purity is 99.8% across 133 positive purity tests.
▸ What you can check next
Reports by test date
203 published records · 0 excluded by the current index · Names on reports; vendor role unverified. A test record is not necessarily a unique certificate.
Key facts
All time unless datedEndotoxin failures
58 classified tests
Expected compound not detected
133 reported purity outcomes
None recordedUnderfilled >15%
17 fill tests · Last 6 months
Overfilled >15%
17 fill tests · Last 6 months
Reported zero amount
127 numeric amount results
None recordedTest results
How the fills compare
53 fill tests · All timeMeasured against the printed amount. Finnrick quantities are excluded.
Beyond the purity average
133 positive testsMean 99.4% · Median 99.8%. The 90% grouping is not a safety threshold.
Test coverage & missing results
70 records have no usable purity outcome. 150 do not have a comparable fill test. 145 lack a classified endotoxin result. A classified pass does not mean no endotoxin was detected.
Community reviews
All 557 reviews →The 10 most recent approved reviews. Buyer experiences—not lab results or verified purchases.
- Reviewer
- vedUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-27
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#197766a3
- Reviewer
- JohnUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-27
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#3badeec6
- Reviewer
- Atticus LeveckUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-26
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#2a3a3ca9
- Reviewer
- LintLickarUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-22
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#65c50eda
- Reviewer
- MattDrudge2Username as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-20
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#fe674bb3
- Reviewer
- Cameron ByerlyUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-17
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#a3857a66
- Reviewer
- UlesimUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-15
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#5a7ad128
- Reviewer
- rikuansemXIIIUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-12
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- NeutralSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#ea732f2f
- Reviewer
- NickoUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-10
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#18cde0cb
- Reviewer
- NickoUsername as posted on Telegram
- Date
- 2026-08-08
- Source
- Telegram
- Tone
- PositiveSoftware-labeled
- Rating
- Not supplied
- Images
- No images
- Review ID
#23891558
Public review excerpts
Prices & value
Market price index →Recorded offers—not a live stock guarantee. Package quantity, delivery market and price basis stay attached.
Listing layout preview. Actual offers appear after access is checked.
Evidence over time
Dated records—not a performance trend2025-07-09 — 2026-09-08
Research involving JEEP
All research →Published investigations, with the sources and context behind the findings.
No vendor-specific investigations are listed yet. The lab evidence and community reviews are available in their tabs.
Questions about JEEP
Answers based on the published evidence—not a vendor endorsement.
Is JEEP legit?
TitrateLab does not rank or recommend vendors; it reports what independent labs measured. JEEP shows high measured purity (99.4% mean across 133 positive purity measurements). Dose accuracy is mixed and no recent result was under label: in the last 12 months 23 of 47 dose results were on target, 0 under label and 24 over; all time 26 of 53 on target, 0 under and 27 over. These results describe tested batches, not every product or shipment.
What is JEEP's average purity?
99.4% mean measured purity across 133 positive third-party lab results; 132 were at or above 90% and 1 was below.
How many JEEP lab certificates has TitrateLab tracked?
203 third-party certificates from 2025-07-09 to 2026-09-08, covering 32 compounds.
How accurate are JEEP's doses?
Dose accuracy is mixed and no recent result was under label: in the last 12 months 23 of 47 dose results were on target, 0 under label and 24 over; all time 26 of 53 on target, 0 under and 27 over. A dose result compares the measured amount with the amount printed on the label: under is more than 10% below, over is more than 10% above, on target is everything in between. Finnrick results are excluded because that lab measures against the vendor's batch claim. Missing values are never counted as passes.
Has JEEP failed an endotoxin test?
Endotoxin was reported on 58 of 203 counted records (28.6%). 19 of 58 classifiable results failed and 3 were borderline.
Sources, definitions & limits
203 published records are attributed to this vendor. The current certificate index excludes 0 repeated records using file hashes and supported lab verification links. Missing identity keys can leave repeated certificates. Recorded name groups can include variants, mixtures and unclassified names.
Evidence dates describe the tested samples, not when the vendor was founded, current stock, or a performance trend. Purity uses positive measurements only. Exact-zero purity is a not-detected identity outcome, not proof of an empty vial. A zero measured amount requires an explicit numeric amount result; missing amounts are not zero.
Underfills and overfills here exceed 15% in either direction against the printed amount. Vendor batch claims are not used; Finnrick quantity comparisons are excluded. Recent outcomes cover 2026-03-17 through 2026-09-17, inclusive. The older published ±10% partition may appear in the existing FAQ and is a different, explicitly labelled threshold. Missing tests are not passing results.
Endotoxin failures, borderline outcomes and passes use the recorded lab verdict. A pass is not proof of no endotoxin. Only 58 records have a classifiable result. Community sentiment describes reviews, not laboratory measurements or independently verified purchases. Results are not certification, medical advice or endorsement.
Missing measurements stay missing. Membership unlocks access, not additional testing.