Independent lab evidence
HM
HM PEPTIDEHM’s lab evidence dates to August 2025 and covers 179 test records across 30 recorded compound names, alongside 0 community reviews. Median purity is 99.8% across 159 positive purity tests.
▸ What you can check next
Reports by test date
179 published records · 0 excluded by the current index · Names on reports; vendor role unverified. A test record is not necessarily a unique certificate.
Key facts
All time unless datedEndotoxin failures
20 classified tests
Expected compound not detected
161 reported purity outcomes
Underfilled >15%
0 fill tests · Last 6 months
Overfilled >15%
0 fill tests · Last 6 months
Reported zero amount
160 numeric amount results
Test results
How the fills compare
36 fill tests · All timeMeasured against the printed amount. Finnrick quantities are excluded.
Beyond the purity average
159 positive testsMean 99.4% · Median 99.8%. The 90% grouping is not a safety threshold.
Test coverage & missing results
18 records have no usable purity outcome. 143 do not have a comparable fill test. 159 lack a classified endotoxin result. A classified pass does not mean no endotoxin was detected.
Community reviews
Buyer experiences—not lab results or verified purchases.
No approved reviews on file yet.
Prices & value
Market price index →Recorded offers—not a live stock guarantee. Package quantity, delivery market and price basis stay attached.
Listing layout preview. Actual offers appear after access is checked.
Evidence over time
Dated records—not a performance trend2025-08-12 — 2026-09-10
Research involving HM
All research →Published investigations, with the sources and context behind the findings.
No vendor-specific investigations are listed yet. The lab evidence and community reviews are available in their tabs.
Questions about HM
Answers based on the published evidence—not a vendor endorsement.
Is HM legit?
TitrateLab does not rank or recommend vendors; it reports what independent labs measured. HM shows high measured purity (99.4% mean across 159 positive purity measurements; 2 identity failures reported separately). Dose accuracy is mixed and no recent result was under label: in the last 12 months 18 of 32 dose results were on target, 0 under label and 14 over; all time 19 of 36 on target, 0 under and 17 over. These results describe tested batches, not every product or shipment.
What is HM's average purity?
99.4% mean measured purity across 159 positive third-party lab results; 158 were at or above 90% and 1 was below. In 2 additional tests, the labeled compound was not detected.
How many HM lab certificates has TitrateLab tracked?
179 third-party certificates from 2025-08-12 to 2026-09-10, covering 28 compounds.
How accurate are HM's doses?
Dose accuracy is mixed and no recent result was under label: in the last 12 months 18 of 32 dose results were on target, 0 under label and 14 over; all time 19 of 36 on target, 0 under and 17 over. A dose result compares the measured amount with the amount printed on the label: under is more than 10% below, over is more than 10% above, on target is everything in between. Finnrick results are excluded because that lab measures against the vendor's batch claim. Missing values are never counted as passes.
Has HM failed an endotoxin test?
Endotoxin was reported on 20 of 179 counted records (11.2%). No failures were recorded in those 20.
Sources, definitions & limits
179 published records are attributed to this vendor. The current certificate index excludes 0 repeated records using file hashes and supported lab verification links. Missing identity keys can leave repeated certificates. Recorded name groups can include variants, mixtures and unclassified names.
Evidence dates describe the tested samples, not when the vendor was founded, current stock, or a performance trend. Purity uses positive measurements only. Exact-zero purity is a not-detected identity outcome, not proof of an empty vial. A zero measured amount requires an explicit numeric amount result; missing amounts are not zero.
Underfills and overfills here exceed 15% in either direction against the printed amount. Vendor batch claims are not used; Finnrick quantity comparisons are excluded. Recent outcomes cover 2026-03-17 through 2026-09-17, inclusive. The older published ±10% partition may appear in the existing FAQ and is a different, explicitly labelled threshold. Missing tests are not passing results.
Endotoxin failures, borderline outcomes and passes use the recorded lab verdict. A pass is not proof of no endotoxin. Only 20 records have a classifiable result. Community sentiment describes reviews, not laboratory measurements or independently verified purchases. Results are not certification, medical advice or endorsement.
Missing measurements stay missing. Membership unlocks access, not additional testing.