Sigma Audley

Is Sigma Audley legit?

TitrateLab has 253 lab test records for Sigma Audley, tested from to , covering 106 product names. Median measured purity is 99.6% across 170 purity tests, and none was below 90%. No fill test is from the last 6 months. None of the 6 classified endotoxin tests failed. The latest report is 14 months old. Lab results describe the batches that were tested, not every product or order.

253Test records106 recorded name groups

Reports by test date

2024-05-022025-09-10

Select a month to list its reports below.

99.6%Median purity170 positive purity tests
0Community reviewsNo approved reviews yet
0

Endotoxin failures

6 classified tests · All time

0

Expected compound not detected

170 reported purity outcomes · All time

None recorded
—

Underfilled >15%

No fill test in the last 6 months

Not tested
—

Overfilled >15%

No fill test in the last 6 months

Not tested
0

Reported zero amount

152 numeric amount results · All time

None recorded

Lab reports

253 test records on file · May 2024 to September 2025

TitrateLab Pro

Unlock report results with Pro.

Read measured purity and contents, open available originals, and explore recorded prices, buyer reviews and alerts for Sigma Audley.

Get Pro access

Membership unlocks access, not additional testing, and is not vendor certification.

Or buy just this vendor: the Sigma Audley report for $5, 30 days of access to every Sigma Audley record on TitrateLab, no subscription.

Test results

How the fills compare

148 fill tests · All time

Measured against the printed amount. Finnrick quantities are excluded.

Beyond the purity average

170 positive tests

Mean 99.2% · Median 99.6%. The 90% grouping is not a safety threshold.

Test coverage & missing results

83 records have no usable purity outcome. 105 do not have a comparable fill test. 247 lack a classified endotoxin result. A classified pass does not mean no endotoxin was detected.

Reports behind these results

Select a result above to list its reports here.

Sigma Audley reviews

Buyer experiences—not lab results or verified purchases.

0Positive
0Neutral
0Negative
0Unclassified

No approved reviews on file yet.

Write a review

Prices & value

Market price index →

Recorded offers—not a live stock guarantee. Package quantity, delivery market and price basis stay attached.

TitrateLab

Open the full price list.

Compare package quantities, prices per vial and per mg, and delivery markets. Both plans also open full lab reports, buyer reviews, watchlists and research tools.

Yearly $88/ year Renews yearly. Cancel anytime. Choose yearly
Monthly $14/ month Renews monthly. Cancel anytime. Choose monthly

Listing layout preview. Actual offers appear after access is checked.

Questions about Sigma Audley

Answers based on the published evidence—not a vendor endorsement.

Is Sigma Audley legit?

TitrateLab has 253 lab test records for Sigma Audley, tested from May 2, 2024 to September 10, 2025, covering 106 product names. Median measured purity is 99.6% across 170 purity tests, and none was below 90%. No fill test is from the last 6 months. None of the 6 classified endotoxin tests failed. The latest report is 14 months old. Lab results describe the batches that were tested, not every product or order.

How to check if a peptide vendor is legit: six checks, and what they cannot prove.

What is Sigma Audley's average purity?

99.2% mean measured purity across 170 positive purity tests; 0 below 90%. The 90% grouping is not a safety threshold.

How many Sigma Audley lab test records has TitrateLab tracked?

TitrateLab has 253 lab test records for Sigma Audley. Tested from 2024-05-02 to 2025-09-10. A test record is not necessarily a unique certificate.

How do Sigma Audley's measured fills compare with the label?

Last 6 months: no comparable fill test. All time: 123 of 148 fill tests within ±15% of label, 2 more than 15% under and 23 more than 15% over. The measured amount is compared with the printed label. Finnrick quantity comparisons are excluded because they use a vendor batch claim. Missing tests are not passes.

Has Sigma Audley failed an endotoxin test?

Of 6 classified endotoxin tests, 0 failed, 0 were borderline and 6 passed. A pass does not mean no endotoxin was detected.

Sources, definitions & limits

Attribution follows the maintained profile; no vendor verification is implied. A test record is not necessarily a unique certificate.

The reports describe the batches that were tested, not an untested vial or an offer from this vendor.

253 published records are attributed to this vendor. The current certificate index excludes 0 repeated records using file hashes and supported lab verification links. Missing identity keys can leave repeated certificates. Recorded name groups can include variants, mixtures and unclassified names.

Evidence dates describe the tested samples, not when the vendor was founded, current stock, or a performance trend. Purity uses positive measurements only. Exact-zero purity is a not-detected identity outcome, not proof of an empty vial. A zero measured amount requires an explicit numeric amount result; missing amounts are not zero.

Underfills and overfills here exceed 15% in either direction against the printed amount. Vendor batch claims are not used; Finnrick quantity comparisons are excluded. Recent outcomes cover 2026-05-01 through 2026-11-01, inclusive. The summary, charts and FAQ use these same definitions. Missing tests are not passing results.

Endotoxin failures, borderline outcomes and passes use the recorded lab verdict. A pass is not proof of no endotoxin. Only 6 records have a classifiable result. Community sentiment describes reviews, not laboratory measurements or independently verified purchases. Results are not certification, medical advice or endorsement.

Independent evidence · Not certification or endorsement · Browse vendors

Review image