Research Comparison

Humanin vs MOTS-c

Side-by-side research comparison of Humanin and MOTS-c across our PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EuropePMC corpus. 16 head-to-head studies plus 45 on Humanin and 121 on MOTS-c.

16 head-to-head · 45 on Humanin · 121 on MOTS-c

At a glance

  Humanin MOTS-c
Drug class n/a mitochondrial peptide
Studies in corpus 45 121
Highest evidence tier meta analysis meta analysis
Evidence tier mix in vitro · 4 preclinical animal · 8 other · 13 cohort · 3 review · 6 rct · 1 meta analysis · 1 other · 36 review · 9 cohort · 6 preclinical animal · 37 in vitro · 8 meta analysis · 1
Studies with explicit sample size 1 1
Head-to-head studies in corpus 16

Lab evidence, head to head

Beyond the literature: here's what third-party Certificate-of-Analysis records (Janoshik, BCC, Auxlabs) say about real Humanin and MOTS-c batches we've tested. Aggregate, public data — cross-reference against the studies below.

Humanin

We tested 27 Humanin batches across 15 manufacturers, 95.94% avg purity.

27
Batches tested
15
Manufacturers
95.94%
Avg purity
1
Failed <90%
5
Underdosed >10%
All Humanin COA records →

MOTS-c

We tested 3692 MOTS-c batches across 1278 manufacturers, 99.46% avg purity.

3692
Batches tested
1278
Manufacturers
99.46%
Avg purity
2
Failed <90%
87
Underdosed >10%
All MOTS-c COA records →

We hold deeper lab coverage on MOTS-c (3692 batches tested). MOTS-c edges ahead on average measured purity (95.94% vs 99.46%) — a narrow gap; weigh it against failed-batch and underdose counts above.

Head-to-head studies

Studies in our corpus that mention both Humanin and MOTS-c — the gold-standard direct comparison evidence.

Top studies per peptide

Vendor data

Looking for vendor-level purity, endotoxin, and HPLC data on Humanin or MOTS-c? TitrateLab tracks Certificate-of-Analysis records from the major peptide labs (Janoshik, BCC, Auxlabs) alongside the research above. Cross-reference vendor batches against the studies on this page.

Explore each peptide