Research Comparison

MOTS-c vs SS-31

Side-by-side research comparison of MOTS-c and SS-31 across our PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EuropePMC corpus. 3 head-to-head studies plus 121 on MOTS-c and 98 on SS-31.

3 head-to-head · 121 on MOTS-c · 98 on SS-31

At a glance

  MOTS-c SS-31
Drug class mitochondrial peptide mitochondrial peptide
Studies in corpus 121 98
Highest evidence tier meta analysis cohort
Evidence tier mix other · 36 review · 9 cohort · 6 preclinical animal · 37 in vitro · 8 meta analysis · 1 preclinical animal · 37 review · 15 other · 14 cohort · 1 in vitro · 14 case report · 1 case series · 1
Studies with explicit sample size 1 1
Head-to-head studies in corpus 3

Lab evidence, head to head

Beyond the literature: here's what third-party Certificate-of-Analysis records (Janoshik, BCC, Auxlabs) say about real MOTS-c and SS-31 batches we've tested. Aggregate, public data — cross-reference against the studies below.

MOTS-c

We tested 3692 MOTS-c batches across 1278 manufacturers, 99.46% avg purity.

3692
Batches tested
1278
Manufacturers
99.46%
Avg purity
2
Failed <90%
87
Underdosed >10%
All MOTS-c COA records →

SS-31

We tested 1601 SS-31 batches across 663 manufacturers, 99.79% avg purity.

1601
Batches tested
663
Manufacturers
99.79%
Avg purity
66
Underdosed >10%
All SS-31 COA records →

We hold deeper lab coverage on MOTS-c (3692 batches tested). SS-31 edges ahead on average measured purity (99.46% vs 99.79%) — a narrow gap; weigh it against failed-batch and underdose counts above.

Head-to-head studies

Studies in our corpus that mention both MOTS-c and SS-31 — the gold-standard direct comparison evidence.

Top studies per peptide

Vendor data

Looking for vendor-level purity, endotoxin, and HPLC data on MOTS-c or SS-31? TitrateLab tracks Certificate-of-Analysis records from the major peptide labs (Janoshik, BCC, Auxlabs) alongside the research above. Cross-reference vendor batches against the studies on this page.

Explore each peptide