Research Comparison

IGF-1 vs MK-677

Side-by-side research comparison of IGF-1 and MK-677 across our PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EuropePMC corpus. 14 head-to-head studies plus 62 on IGF-1 and 57 on MK-677.

14 head-to-head · 62 on IGF-1 · 57 on MK-677

At a glance

  IGF-1 MK-677
Drug class growth factor n/a
Studies in corpus 62 57
Highest evidence tier rct rct
Evidence tier mix cohort · 3 rct · 20 other · 15 case series · 1 case report · 1 preclinical animal · 9 review · 2 in vitro · 2 rct · 10 other · 10 review · 5 preclinical animal · 20 in vitro · 4 case report · 1
Studies with explicit sample size 16 8
Head-to-head studies in corpus 14

Lab evidence, head to head

Beyond the literature: here's what third-party Certificate-of-Analysis records (Janoshik, BCC, Auxlabs) say about real IGF-1 and MK-677 batches we've tested. Aggregate, public data — cross-reference against the studies below.

IGF-1

We tested 17 IGF-1 batches across 10 manufacturers, 99.17% avg purity.

17
Batches tested
10
Manufacturers
99.17%
Avg purity
All IGF-1 COA records →

MK-677

We tested 68 MK-677 batches across 31 manufacturers, 98.6% avg purity.

68
Batches tested
31
Manufacturers
98.6%
Avg purity
5
Underdosed >10%
All MK-677 COA records →

We hold deeper lab coverage on MK-677 (68 batches tested). IGF-1 edges ahead on average measured purity (99.17% vs 98.6%) — a narrow gap; weigh it against failed-batch and underdose counts above.

Head-to-head studies

Studies in our corpus that mention both IGF-1 and MK-677 — the gold-standard direct comparison evidence.

Top studies per peptide

Vendor data

Looking for vendor-level purity, endotoxin, and HPLC data on IGF-1 or MK-677? TitrateLab tracks Certificate-of-Analysis records from the major peptide labs (Janoshik, BCC, Auxlabs) alongside the research above. Cross-reference vendor batches against the studies on this page.

Explore each peptide