MOTS-C — Jett LabsCertificate of Analysis · Independent third-party lab result
This COA was extracted from a community forum / Discord channel. The original poster claimed a lab tested Jett Labs' MOTS-C, but the lab's signature is NOT directly verifiable from this source. The image has passed through at least one re-share. The reported test, dated 2025-12-03 (recent, 3-6 months old), indicates an endotoxin test (USP <85>) for a 40mg sample, with results passing the threshold of ≤ 0.05 EU/mL. No purity data is presented. This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation, due to the chain-of-custody gap.
- chain-of-custody gap
- no purity test
- lab not named
- Test date
- 2025-12-03
- Batch / lot
- —
- Quantity
- 40mg
- Endotoxins
- —
- Assay method
- Endotoxin test
- Label dose
- 40mg
How this result compares
We have catalogued 2293 MOTS-C certificates; across the 2131 with a purity result the median tested purity is 99.52%.
Tested 2025-12-03 via Endotoxin test. This test is newer than 20% of our catalogued MOTS-C certificates.
Jett Labs has 95 certificates in our corpus, including 6 for MOTS-C at a median tested purity of 99.13%.
Forum / Discord scrape
Asserted onlyOCR text Raw extracted text
Extracted via OCR. Names, emails, phone numbers, and street addresses are auto-redacted before display.
{
"peptide": "MOTS-c",
"dose": "40mg",
"purity_pct": null,
"purity_label": "",
"method": "Endotoxin Test (USP <85>)",
"test_date": "2025-12-03",
"client": "Jett Labs",
"notes": "This COA is specifically for Endotoxin testing, with results passing the threshold of \u2264 0.05 EU/mL. The general disclaimer at the bottom mentions peptide purity analysis via LCMS/MS, but no such data is presented in the main results table. Peptides are for research use only, not approved for human or veterinary use, diagnostic, therapeutic, or clinical applications.",
"label_qty": "40mg",
"tested_qty": "",
"quantity_deviation_pct": null,
"is_blend": false,
"components_json": "",
"ocr_confidence": 0.95
}