Research Comparison

HGH vs MK-677

Side-by-side research comparison of HGH and MK-677 across our PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EuropePMC corpus. 6 head-to-head studies plus 45 on HGH and 96 on MK-677.

6 head-to-head · 45 on HGH · 96 on MK-677

At a glance

  HGH MK-677
Drug class growth hormone n/a
Studies in corpus 45 96
Highest evidence tier rct rct
Evidence tier mix rct · 9 other · 11 case series · 1 case report · 3 review · 6 in vitro · 3 preclinical animal · 7 case report · 4 rct · 10 other · 20 preclinical animal · 29 in vitro · 15 review · 15
Studies with explicit sample size 7 2
Head-to-head studies in corpus 6

Lab evidence, head to head

Beyond the literature: here's what third-party Certificate-of-Analysis records (Janoshik, BCC, Auxlabs) say about real HGH and MK-677 batches we've tested. Aggregate, public data — cross-reference against the studies below.

HGH

We tested 405 HGH batches across 130 manufacturers, 96.65% avg purity.

405
Batches tested
130
Manufacturers
96.65%
Avg purity
2
Failed <90%
8
Underdosed >10%
All HGH COA records →

MK-677

We tested 58 MK-677 batches across 29 manufacturers, 98.55% avg purity.

58
Batches tested
29
Manufacturers
98.55%
Avg purity
1
Underdosed >10%
All MK-677 COA records →

We hold deeper lab coverage on HGH (405 batches tested). MK-677 edges ahead on average measured purity (96.65% vs 98.55%) — a narrow gap; weigh it against failed-batch and underdose counts above.

Head-to-head studies

Studies in our corpus that mention both HGH and MK-677 — the gold-standard direct comparison evidence.

Top studies per peptide

Vendor data

Looking for vendor-level purity, endotoxin, and HPLC data on HGH or MK-677? TitrateLab tracks Certificate-of-Analysis records from the major peptide labs (Janoshik, BCC, Auxlabs) alongside the research above. Cross-reference vendor batches against the studies on this page.

Explore each peptide