MOTS-C 98.9% Purity — Jett LabsCertificate of Analysis · Independent third-party lab result
This COA was extracted from a community forum / Discord channel. The original poster claimed a lab tested Jett Labs' MOTS-C, reporting 98.862% purity via HPLC + MS and a quantity deviation of -5.625% (37.75mg tested vs 40mg label). However, the lab's signature is not directly verifiable from this source, and the image has passed through at least one re-share, indicating a chain-of-custody gap. This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation.
- chain-of-custody gap
- no endotoxin test
- vendor-submitted sample
- Test date
- 2025-12-03
- Testing lab
- Unknown
- Batch / lot
- —
- Quantity
- 37.75mg
- Endotoxins
- —
- Assay method
- HPLC + MS
- Label dose
- 40mg
How this result compares
This MOTS-C certificate's tested purity of 98.86% ranks higher than 3% of the 1986 MOTS-C certificates with a purity result we have catalogued (median 99.52%).
Tested 2025-12-03 by Unknown via HPLC + MS. This test is newer than 22% of our catalogued MOTS-C certificates.
Jett Labs has 95 certificates in our corpus, including 6 for MOTS-C at a median tested purity of 99.13%.
Forum / Discord scrape
Asserted onlyOCR text Raw extracted text
Extracted via OCR. Names, emails, phone numbers, and street addresses are auto-redacted before display.
{
"peptide": "MOTS-C",
"dose": "40mg",
"purity_pct": 98.862,
"purity_label": "98.862%",
"method": "HPLC + MS",
"test_date": "2025-12-03",
"client": "Jett Labs",
"notes": "",
"label_qty": "40mg",
"tested_qty": "37.75mg",
"quantity_deviation_pct": -5.625,
"is_blend": false,
"components_json": "",
"ocr_confidence": 0.95
}