All Retatrutide Certificate of Analysis results— 9826 COAs
TitrateLab · Certificate of Analysis

Retatrutide 99.6% Purity — Shanghai Sigma Audley SsaCertificate of Analysis · Independent third-party lab result

Tested purity 99.6% High purity
Dose vs label +18.0% Over the labeled dose
Evidence Asserted only Trust: medium
AI summary Third-party lab

Janoshik tested this retatrutide batch (R10 Red cap 4/29/2025) at 99.562% purity. The tested quantity was 11.8mg against a 10mg label, representing an 18% deviation. The test is older (6-12 months), and details on the test method and endotoxin status are unknown. There is no public verification URL available for this report.

Watch out for
  • stale (6-12 months)
  • no endotoxin test
  • quantity deviation (18%)
Test date
2025-08-25
Testing lab
Janoshik
Batch / lot
R10 Red cap 4/29/2025
Quantity
11.8mg
label 10mg · tested 11.8mg
Endotoxins
Assay method
Context

How this result compares

This Retatrutide certificate's tested purity of 99.56% ranks higher than 18% of the 9821 Retatrutide certificates with a purity result we have catalogued (median 99.83%).

Tested 2025-08-25 by Janoshik. This test is newer than 12% of our catalogued Retatrutide certificates.

Shanghai Sigma Audley Ssa has 468 certificates in our corpus, including 126 for Retatrutide at a median tested purity of 99.70%.

Manufacturer
Shanghai Sigma Audley Ssa
View vendor profile
Source

Third-party community lab

Asserted only
No verifiable evidence captured. This entry was added to our corpus from Third-party community lab. We did not save the certificate image, did not hash an artifact, and the upstream URL is either a domain root or absent — we cannot independently confirm this report existed. Treat as curator-asserted only.
Catalogued
2026-04-24
Related

Other Retatrutide certificates

All Retatrutide results & stats
This certificate is part of TitrateLab's community-trust corpus. See more from Shanghai Sigma Audley Ssa or learn how trust scores are computed on the methodology page. New to lab reports? How to read a COA →