All TB-500 Certificate of Analysis results— 1256 COAs
TitrateLab · Certificate of Analysis

TB-500 99.7% Purity — Shanghai Sigma Audley SsaCertificate of Analysis · Independent third-party lab result

Tested purity 99.7% High purity
Dose vs label -7.4% Under the labeled dose
Evidence Asserted only Trust: low
AI summary Forum scrape

This COA was extracted from a community forum, with the original poster claiming Janoshik tested SSA's TB-500 (batch Sigma Audley TB4). The reported purity was 99.651%, and the tested quantity was 9.26mg against a 10mg label (-7.4% deviation). This is community signal, not confirmation, and the image has passed through at least one re-share, creating a chain-of-custody gap. The test is also stale (over 1 year old).

Watch out for
  • stale (1+ years old)
  • chain-of-custody gap
  • no endotoxin test
Test date
2024-12-31
Testing lab
Janoshik
Batch / lot
Sigma Audley TB4
Quantity
9.26mg
label 10mg · tested 9.26mg
Endotoxins
Assay method
Context

How this result compares

This TB-500 certificate's tested purity of 99.65% ranks higher than 75% of the 1248 TB-500 certificates with a purity result we have catalogued (median 99.39%).

Tested 2024-12-31 by Janoshik. This test is newer than 4% of our catalogued TB-500 certificates.

Shanghai Sigma Audley Ssa has 468 certificates in our corpus, including 6 for TB-500 at a median tested purity of 99.40%.

Manufacturer
Shanghai Sigma Audley Ssa
View vendor profile
Source

Third-party community lab

Asserted only
No verifiable evidence captured. This entry was added to our corpus from Third-party community lab. We did not save the certificate image, did not hash an artifact, and the upstream URL is either a domain root or absent — we cannot independently confirm this report existed. Treat as curator-asserted only.
Catalogued
2026-04-24
Related

Other TB-500 certificates

All TB-500 results & stats
This certificate is part of TitrateLab's community-trust corpus. See more from Shanghai Sigma Audley Ssa or learn how trust scores are computed on the methodology page. New to lab reports? How to read a COA →