All Retatrutide Certificate of Analysis results— 9826 COAs
TitrateLab · Certificate of Analysis

Retatrutide 99.3% Purity — Zlz PeptideCertificate of Analysis · Independent third-party lab result

Tested purity 99.3% High purity
Dose vs label +6.2% Over the labeled dose
Evidence Asserted only Trust: low
AI summary Forum scrape

This COA was extracted from a community forum, with the original poster claiming Vanguard Laboratory tested ZLZ's Retatrutide batch ZLZ R-003. The reported purity was 99.26%, and the tested quantity was 15.93mg against a 15mg label. However, the lab's signature is not directly verifiable, and the test is stale (over a year old). This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation.

Watch out for
  • stale (1+ years old)
  • chain-of-custody gap
  • no endotoxin test
Test date
2024-10-28
Testing lab
[NAME_REDACTED]
Batch / lot
ZLZ R-003
Quantity
15.93mg
label 15mg · tested 15.93mg
Endotoxins
Assay method
Context

How this result compares

This Retatrutide certificate's tested purity of 99.26% ranks higher than 7% of the 9821 Retatrutide certificates with a purity result we have catalogued (median 99.83%).

Tested 2024-10-28 by [NAME_REDACTED]. This test is newer than 1% of our catalogued Retatrutide certificates.

Zlz Peptide has 274 certificates in our corpus, including 100 for Retatrutide at a median tested purity of 99.84%.

Manufacturer
Zlz Peptide
View vendor profile
Source

Third-party community lab

Asserted only
No verifiable evidence captured. This entry was added to our corpus from Third-party community lab. We did not save the certificate image, did not hash an artifact, and the upstream URL is either a domain root or absent — we cannot independently confirm this report existed. Treat as curator-asserted only.
Catalogued
2026-04-24
Related

Other Retatrutide certificates

All Retatrutide results & stats
This certificate is part of TitrateLab's community-trust corpus. See more from Zlz Peptide or learn how trust scores are computed on the methodology page. New to lab reports? How to read a COA →