All research
Oxytocin 2017-02-01 ClinicalTrials

OTR Tablet 10 mg Bioequivalence to OXYCONTIN 10 mg Explored in Fasted Chinese Subjects

OTR Tablet 10 mg Fasted-state Bioequivalence Study

Background

Effective management of chronic pain often relies on opioid analgesics like oxycodone. However, the potential for abuse and misuse of these medications necessitates the development of safer formulations. Tamper-resistant (TR) formulations are designed to deter common methods of abuse, such as crushing or dissolving, thereby reducing the risk of diversion and overdose. For a new TR formulation to be clinically viable, it must demonstrate bioequivalence to its established counterpart, ensuring comparable drug exposure and therapeutic effect. This study addresses the critical need to confirm that the Oxycodone Tamper Resistant (OTR) tablet delivers oxycodone similarly to the widely used OXYCONTIN tablet.

Study Design

This was an open-label, single-dose, randomized, cross-over study designed to confirm the bioequivalence of OTR tablet 10 mg and OXYCONTIN tablet 10 mg. The study was conducted in Chinese subjects experiencing chronic pain, with each participant receiving both formulations in a randomized sequence. The primary objective was to determine the fasted-state pharmacokinetics of oxycodone from both tablets. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, specifically the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCt) of the analyte oxycodone, were measured. The study design involved a single dose administration, followed by a wash-out period, before administration of the alternative formulation, all under fasted conditions.

Results

The study aimed to confirm bioequivalence by analyzing key pharmacokinetic parameters. The primary analysis focused on the AUCt of oxycodone. Statistical evaluation involved an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with fixed effect terms for treatment, period, sequence, and subject within sequence. This ANOVA was applied to the ratio of means (using a log scale) for the AUCt values to determine if the two formulations delivered comparable systemic exposure to oxycodone. However, the provided abstract does not report the actual results of this analysis, such as the calculated ratio of means, confidence intervals, or whether the pre-defined bioequivalence criteria were met for OTR tablet 10 mg compared to OXYCONTIN tablet 10 mg. Therefore, it is not possible to state specific numerical findings or confirm bioequivalence from the available information.

The study's core objective was to statistically compare the systemic exposure of oxycodone from OTR tablet 10 mg and OXYCONTIN tablet 10 mg via AUCt ratios.

Key Findings

  • Study aimed to confirm bioequivalence of OTR tablet 10 mg to OXYCONTIN tablet 10 mg.
  • Pharmacokinetic parameters, specifically AUCt of oxycodone, were assessed in a fasted state.
  • Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was planned for the ratio of means (log scale) of AUCt.
  • Actual bioequivalence results or specific pharmacokinetic data were not reported in the abstract.

Why It Matters

Confirming the bioequivalence of a tamper-resistant opioid formulation like OTR tablet 10 mg to a standard product like OXYCONTIN tablet 10 mg is a crucial step in advancing safer chronic pain management. If bioequivalence is established, it means that patients could potentially transition to a formulation with reduced abuse potential without compromising the efficacy or predictability of their pain relief. This could significantly impact public health by offering a safer alternative for individuals requiring long-term opioid therapy. The development of such formulations is a key strategy in combating the opioid crisis, providing clinicians with tools to mitigate risks while still addressing patients' pain needs. This research contributes to the evidence base for new drug development in pain management.


oxycodone otr oxycontin bioequivalence pharmacokinetics chronic-pain
Source: clinicaltrials:NCT03403504 · Ingested 2026-07-20 · Digest: gemini-2.5-flash