All research
Semaglutide 2026-07-14 PubMed

GLP-1RAs did not improve insulin discontinuation rates versus SGLT-2i or DPP-4i in T2D veterans

Comparative Effectiveness of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Versus Oral Agents for Insulin Discontinuation in Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation.

Background

For patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) on basal insulin, reducing or discontinuing insulin therapy is a significant clinical goal, often associated with improved quality of life and reduced risk of hypoglycemia. While glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are known to decrease insulin requirements and improve glycemic control, their comparative effectiveness in enabling complete insulin discontinuation versus other oral agents like sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) has remained unclear. This gap in understanding impacts treatment strategies for T2D patients aiming to simplify their regimen.

Study Design

Researchers conducted a target trial emulation using U.S. Veterans Health Administration electronic health record (EHR) data from 2020-2022. The study included 8869 matched sets of veterans with T2D receiving basal insulin who initiated either a GLP-1RA (76.6% semaglutide, 15.2% dulaglutide, 7.9% liraglutide, 0.3% exenatide), an SGLT-2i (99.7% empagliflozin), or a DPP-4i (95.9% alogliptin). The primary endpoint was insulin discontinuation, defined as the first gap in insulin prescription fills of 12 months or more over 3 years of follow-up. Data was analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach.

Results

Among the 8869 matched sets, the study found no significant comparative advantage for GLP-1RAs in achieving insulin discontinuation. Over 3 years of follow-up, 1480 (16.7%) GLP-1RA initiators discontinued insulin therapy. This was comparable to 1585 (17.9%) SGLT-2i initiators and 1517 (17.1%) DPP-4i initiators. The risk ratio for the GLP-1RA arm compared with the SGLT-2i arm was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.01), and compared with the DPP-4i arm, it was 0.98 (CI, 0.87 to 1.09). Both confidence intervals crossed 1.0, indicating no statistically significant difference. Subgroup analyses also failed to show a comparative advantage for GLP-1RAs over SGLT-2is or DPP-4is regarding insulin discontinuation.

The intention-to-treat analysis showed that GLP-1RA initiators had a 16.7% rate of insulin discontinuation, which was not statistically different from SGLT-2i initiators (17.9%) or DPP-4i initiators (17.1%).

Key Findings

  • GLP-1RA initiators had a 16.7% insulin discontinuation rate over 3 years.
  • SGLT-2i initiators had a 17.9% insulin discontinuation rate over 3 years.
  • DPP-4i initiators had a 17.1% insulin discontinuation rate over 3 years.
  • Risk ratio for GLP-1RA vs. SGLT-2i was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.01), indicating no significant difference.
  • Risk ratio for GLP-1RA vs. DPP-4i was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.09), indicating no significant difference.

Why It Matters

This study suggests that for veterans with Type 2 Diabetes already on basal insulin, adding a GLP-1RA may not offer a superior chance of discontinuing insulin therapy compared to adding an SGLT-2i or DPP-4i. Clinicians should manage expectations regarding insulin discontinuation when prescribing GLP-1RAs in this population. While GLP-1RAs offer other benefits like cardiovascular protection and weight loss, this specific goal might not be uniquely achieved by them. This insight is crucial for optimizing treatment algorithms and patient counseling, indicating that the choice between these drug classes for insulin-dependent T2D patients should consider factors beyond just the likelihood of stopping insulin.


type-2-diabetes glp-1ra sglt-2i dpp-4i insulin-discontinuation observational-study
Source: pubmed:42441965 · Ingested 2026-07-14 · Digest: gemini-2.5-flash