Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection drives IL-5-independent hypereosinophilia in mepolizumab, benralizumab-treated asthma.
Background
Severe eosinophilic asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by elevated eosinophil levels, often leading to frequent exacerbations. Biologic therapies targeting interleukin-5 (IL-5) or its receptor (IL-5R), such as mepolizumab and benralizumab, effectively reduce eosinophilia and asthma exacerbations by blocking this key type 2 inflammatory pathway. However, the occurrence of breakthrough eosinophilic attacks in patients on these biologics is typically considered a treatment failure, prompting investigation into alternative mechanisms that might drive eosinophilia independently of the IL-5 axis.
Study Design
This report details two case studies of patients with severe asthma receiving anti-IL-5 biologics who experienced relapsing hypereosinophilia. Case 1 involved a 71-year-old woman on mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma and COPD overlap. Case 2 was a 56-year-old woman with late-onset asthma receiving benralizumab. In both cases, the sudden rebound in eosinophil counts coincided with confirmed Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection. The primary observation was the resolution of hypereosinophilia following targeted antibiotic treatment for the bacterial infection.
Results
In Case 1, a 71-year-old woman on mepolizumab experienced a sudden rebound in eosinophils to 1,400 cells/μL during an acute exacerbation, coinciding with
Pseudomonas aeruginosainfection. This hypereosinophilia resolved after antibiotic treatment. Similarly, Case 2, a 56-year-old woman receiving benralizumab, developed marked eosinophil rebound to 1,690 cells/μL, also associated withP. aeruginosainfection. This too resolved after antipseudomonal therapy. These findings suggest thatP. aeruginosainfection can drive eosinophilia through mechanisms independent of theIL-5pathway, even whenIL-5orIL-5Rare blocked by biologics. The consistent resolution of eosinophilia post-antibiotic treatment strongly supports the bacterial infection as the primary driver of the eosinophil rebound.
Why It Matters
Clinicians should consider sputum cultures during asthma exacerbations in patients treated with anti-IL-5 or IL-5R therapies, regardless of type 2 biomarker status. This finding challenges the assumption that breakthrough eosinophilia on biologics always signifies treatment failure or an IL-5-dependent mechanism. Instead, it highlights a potential IL-5-independent pathway where bacterial infections, specifically Pseudomonas aeruginosa, can directly stimulate eosinophil production or recruitment. For patients and practitioners, this means a broader diagnostic approach is warranted, potentially leading to targeted antibiotic treatment rather than simply escalating or switching biologic therapy.