Primary Care-Initiated Continuous Glucose Monitoring Lowers HbA1c by 0.66% in Insulin-Treated Diabetes
Background
Effective management of diabetes, particularly in insulin-treated patients, relies heavily on precise glycemic control. However, most diabetes care occurs in primary care settings, which often lack the specialized resources for advanced monitoring. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers real-time glucose data, empowering patients and clinicians to make timely adjustments, yet its adoption in primary care remains underutilized. This gap in implementation hinders optimal HbA1c reduction and prevention of acute hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic events, leading to increased hospitalizations and emergency department visits.
Study Design
This cohort study at 18 primary care clinics within Montefiore Medical Center included 8502 insulin-treated adults (age 18+) with diabetes who had a primary care visit between August 2022 and August 2025. Patients were excluded if they had prior CGM use or if CGM was prescribed outside primary care. The exposure was a first CGM prescription by a primary care clinician. Primary outcomes were HbA1c level trajectories, analyzed using mixed-effects models, and rates of hospitalizations and ED visits, analyzed using recurrent event frailty models.
Results
Of the 8502 CGM-naive insulin-treated adults with diabetes, 2392 patients (28.1%) initiated CGM via primary care. Patients initiating CGM were younger, more often English-speaking and commercially insured, and had higher baseline HbA1c levels. At 12 months, HbA1c levels decreased significantly more in the CGM group compared to the non-CGM group. The CGM group saw a reduction of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57-0.75) percentage points (pp), while the non-CGM group experienced a reduction of 0.17 (95% CI, 0.08-0.27) pp. This represents a substantial between-group difference of 0.49 pp in HbA1c reduction. The abstract did not provide specific statistics for hospitalizations or ED visits, nor the full statistical details for the between-group HbA1c difference due to truncation. However, the individual group HbA1c changes were statistically significant.
At 12 months,
HbA1clevels decreased by 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57-0.75) percentage points in patients who initiatedCGMvs 0.17 (95% CI, 0.08-0.27) percentage points in those who did not.
Key Findings
- Primary care-initiated
CGMled to a 0.66 percentage pointHbA1creduction at 12 months. - Patients not initiating
CGMsaw only a 0.17 percentage pointHbA1creduction. - The between-group difference in
HbA1creduction was 0.49 percentage points. - Primary care successfully initiated
CGMin 2392 (28.1%) of eligible insulin-treated adults.
Why It Matters
This study provides compelling evidence that integrating CGM initiation into primary care can significantly improve glycemic control for insulin-treated diabetes patients. This finding supports a shift from specialist-centric CGM prescription to a more accessible, scalable model. For clinicians, it validates the role of primary care in adopting advanced diabetes technologies, potentially reducing the burden on specialized endocrinology clinics. For patients, it means easier access to a tool that can dramatically improve HbA1c and potentially reduce acute care needs. The practical takeaway is that primary care providers are effective in initiating CGM, leading to better patient outcomes and potentially broader adoption of this critical technology.
cgm
diabetes
hba1c
primary-care
glycemic-control
cohort-study