Admission NT-proBNP Outperforms AHEAD Score for 1-Year Mortality Prediction in Acute Heart Failure
Background
Accurate risk stratification for acute heart failure (AHF) patients upon hospital admission is crucial for guiding treatment and improving outcomes. Both N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and the AHEAD score are established prognostic markers. However, their comparative and complementary utility for predicting 1-year mortality in AHF patients has remained uncertain, leading to a gap in optimized admission risk assessment protocols. Understanding which marker, or combination, offers superior predictive power could refine clinical decision-making.
Study Design
Researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study screening 512 consecutive adult hospitalizations for acute heart failure. The analytic cohort comprised 430 patients with sufficient baseline data and ascertainable 1-year vital status. They compared admission ln(NT-proBNP) (log-transformed) with the AHEAD score for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality using Cox models. Discrimination was assessed via Harrell C-index, apparent calibration, and reclassification using continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). A combined model of both markers and a combined AHEAD x NT-proBNP stratification were also evaluated.
Results
Over a 1-year period, 84 deaths occurred, representing 19.5% of the cohort. ln(NT-proBNP) was strongly associated with mortality, showing an adjusted HR 2.63 (95% CI 2.05-3.37) per 1-unit increase, equating to approximately HR 1.95 per doubling. While AHEAD categories were associated with mortality in univariable analysis (HR 1.95 for score 2 and 3.61 for score ≥ 3 vs 0-1), these associations were attenuated after adjustment for ln(NT-proBNP) and admission covariates (adjusted HR 1.03 and 1.81).
Key Findings
- Admission NT-proBNP was strongly associated with 1-year mortality (adjusted HR 2.63 per 1-unit ln(NT-proBNP) increase).
- ln(NT-proBNP) showed significantly higher prognostic discrimination (Harrell C-index 0.758) than AHEAD categories (0.608).
- AHEAD score's prognostic value was attenuated after adjusting for ln(NT-proBNP) and other covariates.
- A combined model improved discrimination over AHEAD alone (Delta C-index 0.150, NRI 0.840, IDI 0.136) but not over ln(NT-proBNP) alone.
- The highest NT-proBNP tertile (> 6,385 pg/mL) identified high-risk groups irrespective of AHEAD category.
Why It Matters
This study provides clear evidence that admission NT-proBNP offers superior prognostic power for 1-year mortality in acute heart failure patients compared to the AHEAD score. For clinicians, this suggests that NT-proBNP should be prioritized as the primary biomarker for early risk stratification. While the AHEAD score may still offer complementary clinical context, its independent predictive value is significantly diminished when NT-proBNP is considered. This finding could lead to more streamlined and effective risk assessment protocols, potentially guiding more aggressive interventions or closer monitoring for patients identified with high NT-proBNP levels, regardless of their AHEAD score. It emphasizes the importance of quantitative biomarker data over composite clinical scores in this specific context.
nt-probnp
heart-failure
prognosis
mortality
biomarker
cardiovascular