All research
2026-06-24 PubMed

Higher PIRCHE-T2 and PIRCHE-B scores predict early allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients

Association of PIRCHE scores and allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients.

Background

Early allograft injury within the first year post-transplant is a critical determinant of long-term graft survival in kidney transplantation. Current standard-of-care relies on conventional HLA mismatch to assess alloimmune risk, which often falls short. Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE) scores offer a more nuanced quantification of donor-derived HLA peptides presented to recipient CD4+ T cells via the indirect pathway, potentially capturing alloimmune risk beyond traditional metrics and improving patient stratification.

Study Design

This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated 683 adult kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2021 and 2024. Researchers calculated five-locus PIRCHE-T2 (T-cell epitope load) and PIRCHE-B (surface-accessible amino acid mismatch) scores using high-resolution HLA typing. The primary endpoint was a composite of post-transplant allograft injury within one year, including donor-specific antibody (DSA) development, histologic or molecular rejection, or elevation of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). Predictive performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and compared to an HLA A/B/DR antigen mismatch model.

Results

Among 683 recipients, 250 (37%) experienced the primary composite endpoint of allograft injury within one year. Higher five-locus PIRCHE-T2 and PIRCHE-B scores were significantly associated with this composite outcome. For PIRCHE-T2, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) per point increase was 1.009 (95% CI 1.004-1.014), and for PIRCHE-B, it was 1.043 (95% CI 1.027-1.060). Comparing low versus high-risk groups, the adjusted HR was 1.653 (95% CI 1.254-2.180) for PIRCHE-T2 and 2.280 (95% CI 1.664-3.123) for PIRCHE-B. Both scores demonstrated modest discriminatory performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.575-0.621. Higher PIRCHE scores were also independently associated with an increased risk of de novo or recurrent DSA and dd-cfDNA elevation, and showed trends toward increased rejection risk. Sensitivity analyses including six-locus PIRCHE-T2 (incorporating DQA1) yielded consistent results.

Higher PIRCHE-B scores were particularly impactful, showing an adjusted HR of 2.280 (95% CI 1.664-3.123) for high-risk versus low-risk groups, indicating a more than two-fold increased risk of early allograft injury.

Key Findings

  • 37% of kidney transplant recipients experienced early allograft injury within one year.
  • Higher five-locus PIRCHE-T2 scores were associated with a 1.009 (95% CI 1.004-1.014) adjusted HR per point increase for composite allograft injury.
  • Higher five-locus PIRCHE-B scores were associated with a 1.043 (95% CI 1.027-1.060) adjusted HR per point increase for composite allograft injury.
  • High-risk PIRCHE-B scores showed a 2.280 (95% CI 1.664-3.123) adjusted HR for composite allograft injury compared to low-risk.
  • PIRCHE scores were independently associated with increased risk of DSA development and dd-cfDNA elevation.

Why It Matters

This study suggests that PIRCHE scores could serve as a valuable tool for refining risk stratification in kidney transplant recipients, moving beyond traditional HLA matching. For clinicians, integrating PIRCHE scores into pre-transplant risk assessment could help identify patients at higher risk of early allograft injury, potentially guiding more personalized immunosuppression strategies or intensified post-transplant monitoring. While the discriminatory performance is modest, the independent association with key injury markers like DSA and dd-cfDNA elevation highlights their potential utility. Further research is needed to translate these findings into a usable clinical protocol, but it offers a promising avenue for improving long-term graft survival.


kidney transplant allograft rejection pirche hla alloimmunity cohort study
Source: pubmed:42338598 · Ingested 2026-06-24 · Digest: gemini-2.5-flash