All research
Tirzepatide 2026-06-15 PubMed

GLP-1 RAs show no significant reduction in composite CV death/HF hospitalization but improve quality of life and function in HFpEF.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Across the Heart Failure Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background

Despite established cardiovascular (CV) benefits in obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the role of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) across the entire heart failure (HF) spectrum, particularly in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), remains unclear. Current standard-of-care for HF often falls short in improving both hard outcomes and patient-reported quality of life, highlighting a critical gap for therapies that can address the multifaceted nature of the disease.

Study Design

This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized randomized evidence comparing GLP-1 RAs with placebo in adults with HF across ejection fraction phenotypes. Researchers searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The analysis included 14 studies (six dedicated HF trials and eight cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOT) HF subgroup analyses) encompassing 18,184 patients. The primary outcome was a composite of CV death and first HF hospitalization, analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis with REML estimation and HKSJ adjustment.

Results

The primary composite outcome of CV death and first HF hospitalization was not statistically significant (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.01; P=0.067; I²=47%). However, GLP-1 RAs significantly reduced all-cause mortality (ACM; HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.95; P=0.008) and major adverse CV events (MACE; HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93). They also improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) by 7.4 points and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) by 17.6 m. These benefits were primarily observed in HFpEF patients with obesity.

The observed mortality benefit was largely driven by CVOT subgroups, whereas dedicated HF trials showed a directional harm, warranting cautious interpretation.

Key Findings

  • GLP-1 RAs did not significantly reduce the primary composite outcome of CV death and first HF hospitalization (HR 0.86, P=0.067).
  • GLP-1 RAs reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.86, P=0.008), though with low certainty and driven by CVOT subgroups.
  • GLP-1 RAs reduced major adverse CV events (HR 0.80).
  • GLP-1 RAs improved KCCQ-CSS by 7.4 points and 6MWD by 17.6 m.
  • Mortality benefits were driven by CVOT subgroups, while dedicated HF trials showed directional harm.

Why It Matters

This meta-analysis clarifies that GLP-1 RAs are not a universal solution for all heart failure patients. While they offer significant improvements in quality of life and functional capacity for individuals with HFpEF and obesity, their impact on the primary composite outcome of CV death and HF hospitalization is not statistically significant across the entire spectrum. Clinicians should exercise caution when considering GLP-1 RAs for broader HF populations, especially given the concerning signal of directional harm in dedicated HF trials for mortality. This highlights the need for careful patient selection and further research to delineate specific subgroups that might benefit most, moving towards more personalized HF management strategies.


glp-1-ra heart-failure hfpef hfref cardiovascular meta-analysis
Source: pubmed:42292722 · Ingested 2026-06-15 · Digest: gemini-2.5-flash