Semaglutide deemed cost-effective for HFpEF with obesity in German healthcare, despite substantial budget impact
Background
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent and debilitating condition with limited disease-modifying therapies. Patients with HFpEF often present with obesity, a comorbidity that exacerbates symptoms and worsens prognosis. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) like semaglutide have demonstrated improvements in symptoms and weight in trials like STEP-HFpEF. However, the economic value and affordability of integrating semaglutide into healthcare systems for this specific patient population remained an important unanswered question.
Study Design
Researchers developed a cohort state-transition (Markov) model, based on data from the STEP-HFpEF trial, to assess semaglutide versus placebo. The analysis adopted the perspective of the German statutory health insurance (SHI) system for patients with HFpEF and obesity. Health states were defined by quartiles of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) and death. Primary outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Various sensitivity analyses, including deterministic, probabilistic, and time-horizon scenarios, were performed. A 1-year prevalence-based budget impact analysis estimated additional SHI expenditure under different eligibility and uptake scenarios.
Results
Over a 5-year horizon, semaglutide significantly increased total costs from 12,748.6 € to 17,690.5 € (in 2025 €). Concurrently, it increased QALYs from 3.208 to 3.371, resulting in an ICER of 30,443 €/QALY. This yielded a positive incremental net monetary benefit, indicating economic value. Over a shorter 1-year period, the ICER was higher at 82,237 €/QALY. At the base-case price, the probability of semaglutide being cost-effective at a 100,000 €/QALY threshold was 0.911, which improved with further price reductions. The 1-year budget impact was substantial, ranging from approximately 168 million € to 864 million €, depending on the eligibility criteria and patient uptake.
Semaglutide increased QALYs by 0.163 over 5 years while generating an ICER of 30,443 €/QALY, suggesting it is cost-effective under base-case assumptions.
Key Findings
- Semaglutide increased total costs by 4,941.9 € over 5 years compared to placebo.
- Semaglutide increased quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) by 0.163 over 5 years.
- The 5-year ICER for semaglutide was 30,443 €/QALY in the German system.
- The probability of semaglutide being cost-effective at 100,000 €/QALY was 0.911.
- The 1-year budget impact ranged from 168 million € to 864 million €.
Why It Matters
This study provides crucial economic evidence supporting the integration of semaglutide for HFpEF with obesity into healthcare systems, particularly in Germany. While semaglutide demonstrates cost-effectiveness over a longer horizon, its substantial budget impact highlights that affordability and strategic pricing will be critical for sustainable implementation. For clinicians and policymakers, this means that while the clinical benefits are clear, the financial implications require careful consideration and potentially new reimbursement models. This research informs health technology assessments and pricing negotiations, influencing access to this therapy for a high-need patient population.
semaglutide
hfpef
obesity
cost-effectiveness
health-economics
glp-1-agonist