BPC-157 + GHK-Cu + KPV + TB-500 — Just The ProductCertificate of Analysis · Independent third-party lab result
This COA was extracted from a community forum / Discord channel. The original poster claimed a lab tested JTP Just The Product's blend of GHK-Cu, KPV, BPC-157, and TB-500 via RP-HPLC with UV detection, with the test dated September 4, 2025. However, the lab's signature is not directly verifiable, and the image has passed through at least one re-share, indicating a chain-of-custody gap. This should be treated as community signal, not confirmation.
- chain-of-custody gap
- unknown purity
- no endotoxin test
- Test date
- 2025-09-04
- Batch / lot
- —
- Quantity
- —
- Endotoxins
- —
- Assay method
- RP-HPLC with UV detection
How this result compares
We have catalogued 1205 BPC-157 + GHK-Cu + KPV + TB-500 certificates; across the 1050 with a purity result the median tested purity is 99.72%.
Tested 2025-09-04 via RP-HPLC with UV detection. This test is newer than 4% of our catalogued BPC-157 + GHK-Cu + KPV + TB-500 certificates.
Just The Product has 70 certificates in our corpus, including 4 for BPC-157 + GHK-Cu + KPV + TB-500 at a median tested purity of 99.77%.
Forum / Discord scrape
Asserted onlyOCR text Raw extracted text
Extracted via OCR. Names, emails, phone numbers, and street addresses are auto-redacted before display.
{
"peptide": "GHK-Cu + KPV + BPC-157 + TB-500",
"dose": "",
"purity_pct": null,
"purity_label": "",
"method": "RP-HPLC with UV detection",
"test_date": "2025-09-04",
"client": "JTP Just the Product",
"notes": "",
"label_qty": "",
"tested_qty": "",
"quantity_deviation_pct": null,
"is_blend": true,
"components_json": "[{\"name\": \"GHK-Cu\", \"tested_mg\": 74.11, \"label_mg\": null}, {\"name\": \"KPV\", \"tested_mg\": 12.92, \"label_mg\": null}, {\"name\": \"BPC-157\", \"tested_mg\": 10.89, \"label_mg\": null}, {\"name\": \"TB-500\", \"tested_mg\": 10.95, \"label_mg\": null}]",
"ocr_confidence": 0.95
}