Semaglutide cost-acceptable vs. dulaglutide for Type 2 Diabetes in China, ¥174,904 ICER per QALY.
Background
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) represents a significant public health challenge globally, with China facing a particularly high burden. Effective long-term management is crucial to prevent complications, yet treatment choices must balance clinical efficacy with economic viability, especially within public health insurance systems. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists like semaglutide and dulaglutide offer superior glycemic control and cardiovascular benefits, but their higher cost necessitates rigorous pharmacoeconomic evaluation to inform national health policy and ensure sustainable access.
Study Design
Researchers utilized a Markov model to simulate the progression of T2DM over a 25-year time horizon, comparing semaglutide against dulaglutide from the perspective of China's basic medical insurance. Transition probabilities between health states were derived from the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model (UKPDS 82) and the SUSTAIN 7 clinical trial. Health utility values were sourced from published literature using the Chinese EQ-5D-5L value set. Both one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to assess the robustness of the model's long-term cost-effectiveness projections.
Results
After a 25-year simulation period, the total cost for dulaglutide was ¥193,353.07, yielding 11.628 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). In comparison, semaglutide incurred a total cost of ¥240,925.08, resulting in 11.900 QALYs.
Compared with dulaglutide, semaglutide demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (
ICER) of ¥174,904 per QALY gained, which is approximately twice China's 2023 per capita GDP (¥89,358). According to the Chinese Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation (2020), this ICER falls within the economically acceptable range (1 × GDP < ICER ≤ 3 × GDP). One-way sensitivity analysis confirmed the model's robustness, despite health state utility values being the most influential parameter.PSAfurther indicated that at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 3 times the per capita GDP (¥268,074), semaglutide had an 89.6% probability of being considered economically acceptable.
Key Findings
- Dulaglutide total cost: ¥193,353.07 with 11.628 QALYs over 25 years.
- Semaglutide total cost: ¥240,925.08 with 11.900 QALYs over 25 years.
- Semaglutide's
ICERvs. dulaglutide: ¥174,904 per QALY gained. ICERis approximately twice China's 2023 per capita GDP (¥89,358).- Semaglutide has an 89.6% probability of being economically acceptable at 3x GDP
WTPthreshold.
Why It Matters
This analysis provides critical pharmacoeconomic evidence for clinical decision-making and health policy formulation in China, particularly regarding the inclusion and reimbursement of GLP-1R agonists. The finding that semaglutide is cost-acceptable relative to dulaglutide within China's healthcare system could influence national drug procurement and formulary decisions, potentially expanding access to this highly effective treatment for Type 2 Diabetes. For clinicians and patients, it reinforces the value proposition of semaglutide, suggesting that its superior clinical benefits are achieved at a justifiable incremental cost, aligning with national economic guidelines. This supports broader adoption and integration into standard T2DM management protocols.
semaglutide
dulaglutide
type-2-diabetes
cost-effectiveness
pharmacoeconomics
china